JERUSALEM – There is no genocide in Gaza. What followed the Hamas-led terrorist attacks in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, was a military response by Israel aimed at dismantling the group responsible. It was the logical result of attacking a sovereign state and using civilians as human shields.
The accusation that Israel is committing genocide in the Palestinian enclave has become a popular slogan among Israel’s critics and far too many hostile governments ever since that Black Shabbat. It’s repeated in protests, in the media, and even in international courtrooms. But slogans are not evidence, and repeating a falsehood again and again doesn’t make it true.
Genocide has a specific legal definition. According to the 1948 Genocide Convention, it refers to acts committed with the intent to destroy a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group in whole or in part. Not simply killing. Not even killing large numbers of civilians. Intent is essential, and there is no credible evidence that Israel intends to eliminate the Palestinian people.
Israel’s stated goal has been the elimination of Hamas, a terrorist organization that has ruled Gaza for nearly 20 years and concentrated on attacking Israeli families ever since. This is not speculation. It is backed by years of rocket attacks, terror tunnel construction, hostage-taking, and open calls for Israel’s destruction. Hamas is a legitimate military target by any standard of warfare. It is a U.S.-designated Foreign Terrorist Organization.
Hamas was not imposed on the civilian population in Gaza by force. It was elected in 2006 and never removed. Its rule has continued with the support or acquiescence of much of the population. After the Oct. 7 massacre, many Gazans were seen celebrating. Crowds cheered as hostages were dragged into the Strip. There were no mass protests against the attack. No significant internal resistance to the regime.
Gaza is not an occupied territory. It is a self-governing entity that chose—and stood by—the group responsible for triggering the war.
The civilian death toll is often used as evidence of genocide. But numbers alone don’t prove intent. And in Gaza’s case, they don’t even support the claim of mass extermination. Before the war, Gaza’s population stood at roughly 2.1 million. As of 2025, it has dropped by around 6%—a number that includes those killed, missing or displaced. That figure also reflects large-scale evacuations.
And the source of those casualty numbers—Gaza’s Health Ministry—is entirely controlled by Hamas. It is not an independent agency. It operates under Hamas authority, uses Hamas-provided data, and has every incentive to inflate numbers and blur the line between militants and civilians. Its claims should be treated as propaganda, not fact.
Egypt has confirmed that more than 100,000 Gazans crossed its border since October 2023. The World Health Organization reports nearly 5,000 medical patients were evacuated, most with companions. Israeli media reports that about 36,000 Gazans have left for third countries like Jordan, the United Arab Emirates, and parts of Europe.
In a genocide, civilians are not permitted to flee. Corridors are not open. Hostile states do not coordinate evacuations. But in Gaza, tens of thousands have left. Many more were repeatedly warned to evacuate combat zones. This is not what genocide looks like.
Moreover, the Gaza population still numbers in the millions. There is no plan to erase them. There is no forced sterilization, no ethnic cleansing campaign, no effort to eliminate their identity or culture. What there was, before the current ceasefire, was a military operation aimed at destroying a terrorist regime hiding among civilians.
Hamas deliberately operates from hospitals, mosques, and homes—not because it has no choice, but because it understands Western media and politics. Every civilian death is a tool. Every destroyed building is a headline. This is intentional, and it’s effective. Accusations of genocide are the payoff.
The legal and moral absurdity of this claim is compounded by the fact that Gaza’s suffering is not a one-sided tragedy; it is a consequence of actions that derive from the Strip. It is a direct result of supporting, harboring, and celebrating a group committed to endless war. Responsibility matters. Choices have consequences.
The misuse of the term “genocide” is not harmless. It distorts international law, insults the victims of real genocides, especially Jews murdered in the Holocaust, and fuels further conflict. It gives cover to terrorist groups who understand that hiding behind civilians earns them global sympathy.
This is not a genocide. It is a war. And like all wars, it ends when one side is defeated. If Gazans truly want to avoid further suffering, the path is not through protest slogans or legal theatrics; it’s through cutting ties with Hamas and rejecting its vision of perpetual violence.
Anything less is just blaming others for a war they helped start by electing Hamas and supporting it.
Thank you for reading. If you value independent Jewish journalism, help keep our reporting free and reliable, share this article, subscribe for regular coverage, or donate $10, $25, or $50 today.
Every gift powers timely, trusted reporting and amplifies pro-Israel voices defending Jewish rights worldwide. Donate now.
The opinions and facts presented in this article are those of the author, and neither TheJ.Ca nor its partners assume any responsibility for them.
Moshe Phillips is national chairman of Americans For A Safe Israel (www.AFSI.org), a leading pro-Israel advocacy and education organization.
If you had any doubts about the true motivations and malicious agenda behind those promoting the “genocide” narrative, just look at how quickly the same biased and openly anti-Israel Wikipedia editors rushed to create a page framing any challenge to that claim as “denial.” The goal is not honest debate or historical accuracy — it is to delegitimize Israel, silence dissent, and distort the meaning of genocide itself. In many ways, this has become a sophisticated modern form of Holocaust distortion and even indirect Holocaust denial: by trivializing and weaponizing the term “genocide” against the Jewish state, they erode the historical uniqueness and documented reality of the Holocaust while turning its language against its survivors and descendants.
Historically, the first “Palestinian” Arab leader to accuse with the supposed “genocide” thing was PLO’s Farouk Qaddoumi In May 1974 [reported on 5/19/74 in SMH] when Israel began responding to the “Palestinian” horrific May/15 Ma’alot massacre. He, who on a December 7, 2013 interview admitted the Arab-Palestinians supported the Nazis, because they both opposed Zionism.
Next up was “Palestinian” Arab neo-Nazi Issa Nakhleh in a Holocaust denial IHR Nov. 1981. While infamous dreadful Holocaust denying group has always refused to define the Holocaust events as genocide, they had Makhleh as a featured speaker blabbing about a zionist so called “genocide.”
The confirmation bias by those (Amnesty intl; HRW under Omar Shakir; B’tselem; Omer Bartov, etc.) who, already, earlier peddled the “apartheid” lie.
The first “apartheid” accuser was Ahmad Shukeiri on Oct 17, 1961. He who admitted in his 1969 book on Arab-Palestinians: “our sympathies were with with the Axis powers being led by Hitler”; had justified the Holocaust together with Jamal Husseini soon after it occurred (as reported in B’nai B’rith on July 12, 1946); in the UN, he had promoted neo-Nazi Tacuara on Nov 30, 1962 and had revealed Arab leadership true genocidal intentions: ‘none of them will survive’ on June 1, 1967.
The current “genocide” campaign began immediately after genocidal Palestinian Oct 7 onslaught, led by genocidal Hamas (as in its charter and expressions throughout. The Atlantic, 10/10/23: “Understanding Hamas’s Genocidal Ideology”; ISGAP, 2/7/24: “What Hamas Leaders Actually Want – In Their Own Words”) with the aims to ‘kill as many as possible’ (Telegraph, 10/14/23: “Hamas planned killing of young children, secret documents reveal. Terrorists aimed to specifically target young people and ‘kill as many’ Israelis as possible”).
Weeks later, Hamas vowed to repeat the October 7 attacks “again and again” until Israel is completely destroyed. (JPost, 11/1/23: “‘We will repeat October 7 again and again’ – Hamas official”).
The accusation campaign, was an engineered diversion and projection.
Clearly the war [was and is] aimed at Gaza Hamas government while Israel’s risking soldiers lives in urban warfare with extraordinary comparable success in minimizing civilian casualties (Experts: A. Fox in JPost, 11/6/25: “Western militaries can’t afford to boycott IDF’s battle-tested Gaza tactics – analysis”; J. Spencer on X 1/28/26: “The irony is that even when relying on Hamas’s own false or unverified numbers, Israel’s combatant-to-civilian casualty ratio remains historically low by any serious comparison to urban warfare. The data, stripped of manipulation and advocacy, does not support claims of indiscriminate or unlawful conduct. It demonstrates the opposite”) and urging Gazan civilians evacuations while Hamas prevents and uses them as human shields (HJS, 5/4/25: “Hamas’s Human Shield Strategy in Gaza.” WSJ, 6/17/24: “The Brutal Calculation of Hamas’s Leader”).
Quoting one line at moment of anger Oct/2023] while omitting immediate clarification that it means only Hanas. Is a gross error. Worse is citing anyone not part of War Cabinet by Netanyahu.
UN: UNRWA vastly involvement in Oct 7 atrocities has ben exposed. Dubbed modern Goebbels Francesca Albanese’s dreadful hate record (see UNWatch) is infamous since her 2014 hateful tweets. Or C.O.I. Miloon Kothari’s “Jewish control” 2022 trope.
Most Western nations clearly oppose this while 127 fake $30 “experts” (IAGS) support, at least 537 history and genocide real experts opposed it. (TimesOfIsrael, 9/9/25:
“More than 500 experts sign demand that genocide ‘scholars’ group retract accusation against Israel”).